<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SQL: ranking without self join, revisited</title>
	<atom:link href="http://code.openark.org/blog/mysql/sql-ranking-without-self-join-revisited/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://code.openark.org/blog/mysql/sql-ranking-without-self-join-revisited</link>
	<description>Blog by Shlomi Noach</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 12:08:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: shlomi</title>
		<link>http://code.openark.org/blog/mysql/sql-ranking-without-self-join-revisited/comment-page-1#comment-4336</link>
		<dc:creator>shlomi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 07:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://code.openark.org/blog/?p=1330#comment-4336</guid>
		<description>Yikes!!

Browsing through High Performance MySQL (2nd Ed.), I suddenly notice this has all been discussed at length, at the end of chapter 4.
Seems like I&#039;ve mostly repeated things that have been said there; I apparently offer little new.

Shlomi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yikes!!</p>
<p>Browsing through High Performance MySQL (2nd Ed.), I suddenly notice this has all been discussed at length, at the end of chapter 4.<br />
Seems like I&#8217;ve mostly repeated things that have been said there; I apparently offer little new.</p>
<p>Shlomi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shlomi</title>
		<link>http://code.openark.org/blog/mysql/sql-ranking-without-self-join-revisited/comment-page-1#comment-4283</link>
		<dc:creator>shlomi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://code.openark.org/blog/?p=1330#comment-4283</guid>
		<description>Hi Roland,

Thank you. I will make an effort to get more reliable information.
I think we should avoid the situation where we say &quot;hmmm.. we&#039;re not sure about this so let&#039;s not use it&quot;, but push towards a reliable answer.

Shlomi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Roland,</p>
<p>Thank you. I will make an effort to get more reliable information.<br />
I think we should avoid the situation where we say &#8220;hmmm.. we&#8217;re not sure about this so let&#8217;s not use it&#8221;, but push towards a reliable answer.</p>
<p>Shlomi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roland Bouman</title>
		<link>http://code.openark.org/blog/mysql/sql-ranking-without-self-join-revisited/comment-page-1#comment-4280</link>
		<dc:creator>Roland Bouman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://code.openark.org/blog/?p=1330#comment-4280</guid>
		<description>BTW: I just wanted to say I agree with your analysis regarding the limitions of using GROUP_CONCAT (as I did in my example)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW: I just wanted to say I agree with your analysis regarding the limitions of using GROUP_CONCAT (as I did in my example)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roland Bouman</title>
		<link>http://code.openark.org/blog/mysql/sql-ranking-without-self-join-revisited/comment-page-1#comment-4279</link>
		<dc:creator>Roland Bouman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://code.openark.org/blog/?p=1330#comment-4279</guid>
		<description>Hi Shlomi! 

Nice trick. I&#039;m not entirely convinced though, but it looks promising. I&#039;ll do my best to try and falsify the result (:p) not to bug you of course, but to achieve more certainty that this is indeed reliable. 

Thanks so far :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Shlomi! </p>
<p>Nice trick. I&#8217;m not entirely convinced though, but it looks promising. I&#8217;ll do my best to try and falsify the result (:p) not to bug you of course, but to achieve more certainty that this is indeed reliable. </p>
<p>Thanks so far <img src='http://code.openark.org/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
