Skip to content

# Tag: QueryScript

## Why delegating code to MySQL Stored Routines is poor engineering practice

MySQL common_schema Development Opinions QueryScript Stored routines February 6, 2014December 27, 2016

I happen to use stored routines with MySQL. In fact, my open source project common_schema heavily utilizes them. DBA-wise, I think they provide with a lot of power (alas, the ANSI:SQL 2003 syntax feels more like COBOL than a sane programming language, which is why I use QueryScript instead).

However I wish to discuss the use of stored routines as integral part of your application code, which I discourage.

The common discussion on whether to use or not use stored routines typically revolves around data transfer (with stored routines you transfer less data since it’s being processed on server side), security (with stored routines you can obfuscate/hide internal datasets, and provide with limited and expected API) and performance (with MySQL this is not what you would expect, as routines are interpreted & their queries re-evaluated, as opposed to other RDBMS you may be used to).

But I wish to discuss the use of stored routines from an engineering standpoint. The first couple of points I raise are cultural/behavioural.

#### 2nd grade citizens

Your stored routines are not likely to integrate well with your IDE. While your Java/Scala/PHP/Ruby/whatnot code comfortably lies within your home directory, the stored routines live in their own space: a database container. They’re not as visible to you as your standard code. Your IDE is unaware of their existence and is unlikely to have the necessary plugin/state of mind to be able to view these.

This leads to difficulty in maintaining the code. People typically resort to using some SQL-oriented GUI tool such as MySQL Workbench, SequelPro or other, commercial tools. But these tools, while make it easy to edit your routine code, do not integrate (well?) with your source control. I can’t say I’ve used all GUI tools; but how many of them will have Git/SVN/Mercurial connectors? How many of them will keep local history changes once you edit a routine? I’m happy to get introduced to such a tool.

Even with such integration, you’re split between two IDEs. And if you’re the command line enthusiast, well, you can’t just svn ci -m “fixed my stored procedure bug”. Your code is simply not in your trunk directory.

It can be done. You could maintain the entire routine code from within your source tree, and hats off to all those who do it. Most will not. See later on about deployments for more on this. Continue reading » “Why delegating code to MySQL Stored Routines is poor engineering practice”

## Converting an OLAP database to TokuDB, part 1

MySQL common_schema compression InnoDB Open Source Performance QueryScript TokuDB September 3, 2013September 3, 2013

This is the first in a series of posts describing my impressions of converting a large OLAP server to TokuDB. There’s a lot to tell, and the experiment is not yet complete, so this is an ongoing blogging. In this post I will describe the case at hand and out initial reasons for looking at TokuDB.

Disclosure: I have no personal interests and no company interests; we did get friendly, useful and free advice from Tokutek engineers. TokuDB is open source and free to use, though commercial license is also available.

#### The case at hand

We have a large and fast growing DWH MySQL setup. This data warehouse is but one component in a larger data setup, which includes Hadoop, Cassandra and more. For online dashboards and most reports, MySQL is our service. We populate this warehouse mainly via Hive/Hadoop. Thus, we have an hourly load of data from Hive, as well as a larger daily load.

There are some updates on the data, but the majority of writes are just mysqlimports of Hive queries.

Usage of this database is OLAP: no concurrency issues here; we have some should-be-fast-running queries issued by our dashboards, as well as ok-to-run-longer queries issued for reports.

Our initial and most burning trouble is with size. Today we use COMPRESSED InnoDB tables (KEY_BLOCK_SIZE is default, i.e. 8). Our data volume sums right now at about 2TB. I happen to know this translates as 4TB of uncompressed data.

However growth of data is accelerating. A year ago we would capture a dozen GB per month. Today it is a 100GB per month, and by the end of this year it may climb to 150GB per month or more.

Our data is not sharded. We have a simple replication topology of some 6 servers. Machines are quite generous as detailed following. And yet, we will be running out of resources shortly: disk space (total 2.7TB) is now running low and is expected to run out in about six months. One of my first tasks in Outbrain is to find a solution to our DWH growth problem. The solution could be sharding; it could be a commercial DWH product; anything that works. Continue reading » “Converting an OLAP database to TokuDB, part 1”

## common_schema 2.2: better QueryScript isolation & cleanup; TokuDB; table_rotate, split params

MySQL common_schema Development Open Source QueryScript August 13, 2013

common_schema 2.2 is released. This is shortly after the 2.1 release; it was only meant as bug fixes release but some interesting things came up, leading to new functionality.

Highlights of the 2.2 release:

- Better QueryScript isolation & cleanup: isolation improved across replication topology, cleanup done even on error
- Added TokuDB related views
- split with “index” hint (Ike, this is for you)
- table_rotate(): a logrotate-like mechanism for tables
- better throw()

Drill down:

#### Better QueryScript isolation & cleanup

common_schema 2.1 introduced persistent tables for QueryScript. This also introduced the problem of isolating concurrent scripts, all reading from and writing to shared tables. In 2.1 isolation was based on session id. However although unique per machine, collisions were possible across replication topology: a script could be issued on master, another on slave (I have such use cases) and both use same (local) session id.

With 2.2 isolation is based on server_id & session id combination; this is unique across a replication topology.

Until 2.1, QueryScript used temporary tables. This meant any error would just break the script, and the tables were left (isolated as they were, and auto-destroyed in time). With persistent tables a script throwing an error meant legacy code piling up. With common_schema 2.2 and on MySQL >= 5.5 all exceptions are caught, cleanup is made, leaving exceptions to be RESIGNALled.

#### TokuDB views

A couple TokuDB related views help out in converting to TokuDB and in figuring out tables status on disk: Continue reading » “common_schema 2.2: better QueryScript isolation & cleanup; TokuDB; table_rotate, split params”

## common_schema roadmap thoughts

MySQL common_schema community Development Open Source QueryScript July 22, 2013

I’m happy with common_schema; it is in fact a tool I use myself on an almost daily basis. I’m also happy to see that it gains traction; which is why I’m exposing a little bit of my thoughts on general future development. I’d love to get feedback.

#### Supported versions

At this moment, common_schema supports MySQL >= 5.1, all variants. This includes 5.5, 5.6, MySQL, Percona Server & MariaDB.

5.1 is today past end of line, and I’m really missing the SIGNAL/RESIGNAL syntax that I would like to use; I can do in the meanwhile with version-specific code such as /*!50500 … */. Nevertheless, I’m wondering whether I will eventually have to:

- Support different branches of common_schema (one that supports 5.1, one that supports >= 5.5)
- Stop support for 5.1

Of course community-wise, the former is preferred; but I have limited resources, so I would like to make a quick poll here:

Which versions of MySQL are you running common_schema on, and would want to keep on running?

- 5.1
- 5.5
- 5.6
- 5.7 (alpha)
- MariaDB 10.0 (alpha)

View Results

Loading ...

I’ll use the poll’s results as a vague idea of what people use and want. Or please use comments below to sound your voice!

#### rdebug

This was a crazy jump at providing a stored routine debugger and debugging API. From some talk I made I don’t see this getting traction. For the time being, I don’t see that I will concentrate my efforts on this. Actually it is almost complete. You can step-into, step-out, step-over, set breakpoints, read variables, modify variables — it’s pretty cool. Continue reading » “common_schema roadmap thoughts”

## common_schema 2.1 released: advanced & improved split(), persistent script tables, more schema analysis, and (ahem) charts!

MySQL charts common_schema Development Open Source QueryScript July 17, 2013

common_schema 2.1 is released! common_schema is your free & open source companion schema within your MySQL server, providing with a function library, scripting capabilities, powerful routines and ready-to-apply information and recommendations.

New and noteworthy in version 2.1:

- Better QueryScript’s split() functionality
- Persistent tables for QueryScript: no long held temporary tables
- Index creation analysis, further range partition analysis
- grant_access(): allow everyone to use common_schema
- Ascii charts, google charts
- debugged_routines: show routines with debug code

Other minor enhancements and bugfixes not listed.

Here’s a breakdown of the above:

#### split() enhancements

split is one of those parts of common_schema that (should) appeal to every DBA. Break a huge transaction automagically into smaller chunks, and don’t worry about how it’s done. If you like, throttle execution, or print progress, or…

split enhancements include:

- A much better auto-detection-and-selection of the chunking index. split now consults all columns covered by the index, and uses realistic heuristics to decide which UNIQUE KEY on your table is best for the chunking process. A couple bugs are solved on the way; split is much smarter now.
- Better support for multi-column chunking keys. You may now utilize the start/stop parameters even on multi column keys, passing a comma delimited of values for the split operation to start/end with, respectively. Also fixed issue for nonexistent start/stop values, which are now valid: split will just keep to the given range.
- split no longer requires a temporary table open through the duration of its operation. See next section. Continue reading » “common_schema 2.1 released: advanced & improved split(), persistent script tables, more schema analysis, and (ahem) charts!”

## opeark-kit revision 196 released

MySQL Development Open Source openark kit QueryScript May 7, 2013

This is a long due maintenance release of openark-kit. This release includes bugfixes and some enhancements, mainly to oak-online-alter-table.

oak-online-alter-table Changes / bug fixes include:

- Support for keyword-named columns
- Use of FORCE INDEX due to lack of MySQL’s ability for figure out the chunking key at all times
- –sleep-ratio option added; allows for sleep time proportional to execution time (as opposed to constant sleep time with –sleep)
- Support for chunk-retry (in case of deadlock) via –max-lock-retries)
- Fixed order of cleanup
- Fixed bug with verbose messages with non-integer chunking key
- Fixed bug with single-row tables (people, no need for this tool for single row tables :))
- Friendly verbose messages to remind you what’s being executed

oak-chunk-update changes includes:

- Verbosing query comment if exists (friendly printing of what’s being executed)

Continue reading » “opeark-kit revision 196 released”

## common_schema: 1.3: security goodies, parameterized split(), json-to-xml, query checksum

MySQL common_schema Development New Features Open Source QueryScript scripts Security January 14, 2013January 14, 2013

common_schema 1.3 is released and is available for download. New and noteworthy in this version:

- Parameterized split(): take further control over huge transactions by breaking them down into smaller chunks, now manually tunable if needed
- duplicate_grantee(): copy+paste existing accounts along with their full set of privileges
- similar_grants: find which accounts share the exact same set of privileges (i.e. have the same role)
- json_to_xml(): translate any valid JSON object into its equivalent XML form
- extract_json_value(): use XPath notation to extract info from JSON data, just as you would from XML
- query_checksum(): given a query, calculate a checksum on the result set
- random_hash(): get a 40 hexadecimal digits random hash, using a reasonably large changing input

Let’s take a closer look at the above:

#### Parameterized split()

split takes your bulk query and automagically breaks it down into smaller pieces. So instead of one huge UPDATE or DELETE or INSERT..SELECT transaction, you get many smaller transactions, each with smaller impact on I/O, locks, CPU.

As of 1.3, split() gets more exposed: you can have some control on its execution, and you also get a lot of very interesting info during operation.

Here’s an example of split() control:

>     set @script := "
>       split({start:7015, step:2000} : UPDATE sakila.rental SET return_date = return_date + INTERVAL 1 DAY)
>         throttle 1;
>     ";
>     call common_schema.run(@script);

In the above we choose a split size of 2,000 rows at a time; but we also choose to only start with 7015, skipping all rows prior to that value. Just what is that value? It depends on the splitting key (and see next example for just that); but in this table we can safely assume this is the rental_id PRIMARY KEY of the table.

You don’t have to use these control parameters. But they can save you some time and effort. Continue reading » “common_schema: 1.3: security goodies, parameterized split(), json-to-xml, query checksum”

## common_schema over traditional scripts

MySQL common_schema openark kit python QueryScript scripts Stored routines December 12, 2012

If you are familiar with both openark kit and common_schema, you’ll notice I’ve incorporated some functionality already working in openark kit into common_schema, essentially rewriting what used to be a Python script into SQL/QueryScript.

What was my reasoning for rewriting good code? I wish to explain that, and provide with a couple examples.

I’m generally interested in pushing as much functionality into the MySQL server. When using an external script, one:

- Needs the right dependencies (OS, Perl/Python version, Perl/Python modules).
- Needs to provide with connection params,
- Needs to get acquainted with a lot of command line options,
- Is limited by whatever command line options are provided.
- Has to invoke that script (duh!) to get the work done.

This last bullet is not so trivial: it means you can’t work some operation with your favorite GUI client, because it has no notion of your Perl script; does not run on the same machine where your Python code resides; simply can’t run those scripts for you.

With server-side code, functionality is accessible via any client. You run your operation via a query (e.g. CALL some_procedure). That can be done from your GUI client, your command line client, your event scheduler, your cronjob, all equally. You only need access to your MySQL server, which is trivial.

Of course, server side scripting is limited. Some stuff simply can’t be written solely on server side. If you want to consult your replicating slave; gracefully take action on user’s Ctrl+C, send data over the web, you’ll have to do it with an external tool. There are actually a lot of surprising limitations to things one would assume are possible on server side. You may already know how frustrated I am by the fact one can hardly get info from SHOW commands.

#### But, when it works, it shines

Let’s review a couple examples. The first one is nearly trivial. The second less so. Continue reading » “common_schema over traditional scripts”

## Purging old rows with QueryScript: three use cases

MySQL Bulk operations common_schema Indexing QueryScript scripts November 14, 2012November 14, 2012

Problem: you need to purge old rows from a table. This may be your weekly/monthly cleanup task. The table is large, the amount of rows to be deleted is large, and doing so in one big DELETE is too heavy.

You can use oak-chunk-update or pt-archiver to accomplish the task. You can also use server side scripting with QueryScript, offering a very simple syntax with no external scripting, dependencies and command line options.

I wish to present three cases of row deletion, with three different solutions. In all cases we assume some TIMESTAMP column exists in table, by which we choose to purge the row. In all cases we assume we wish to purge rows older than 1 month.

We assume the naive query is this:

>     DELETE FROM my_schema.my_table WHERE row_timestamp < CURDATE() - INTERVAL 1 MONTH

#### Case 1: TIMESTAMP column is indexed

I almost always index a timestamp column, if only for being able to quickly purge data (but usually also to slice data by date). In this case where the column is indexed, it’s very easy to figure out which rows are older than 1 month.

We break the naive query into smaller parts, and execute these in sequence: Continue reading » “Purging old rows with QueryScript: three use cases”

## common_schema 1.2: security, partition management, processes, QueryScript goodies

MySQL common_schema Open Source partitioning QueryScript Security November 13, 2012

common_schema 1.2 is released! This version comes shortly after 1.1, yet contains quite a few interesting goodies:

- Account blocking
- Security audit
- RANGE partition management
- Slave status
- Better blocking and idle transaction management
- QueryScript goodies:
  - echo, report
  - while-otherwise statement; foreach-otherwise statement
  - Better variable scope handling
  - Complete support for variable expansion
  - Transaction support within QueryScript
- More summary info and SQL statements in processlist-related views

A closer look at these follows:

#### Account blocking

A new view called sql_accounts, inspired by oak-block-account (also see here and here) provides with the means of blocking use accounts (and releasing them, of course) without revoking their privileges. It offers the SQL statements to block an account (by modifying its password in a symmetric way) and to release an account (by modifying its password back to normal). It really works like a charm. Together with killall() and sql_accounts this gives the administrator great control over accounts.

#### Security audit

Imported from openark kit, and implemented via QueryScript, the security_audit() procedure will audit your accounts, passwords and general settings to find problems, pitfalls and security hazards. I will write more on this later.

#### RANGE partition management

The sql_range_partitions view manages your RANGE and RANGE COLUMNS partitioned tables by providing with the SQL statements to drop oldest partitions and to create the next (in sequence) partitions. See my earlier post. Continue reading » “common_schema 1.2: security, partition management, processes, QueryScript goodies”